Daily Report — 2026-02-09

Daily Overview

• What was done: Implemented direct metrics annotation on spatial clustering plots and successfully ran extensive benchmarks for embedding alignment evaluation.
• How it was done: Refactored matplotlib subplot layouts to inject ARI/NMI text directly into PNG outputs, while orchestrating multi-parallel bash jobs for RM-Ideal niche evaluations.
• Impact: Enabled immediate visual correlation between model scores and spatial clusterings, and systematically resolved critical data path dependencies blocking comprehensive slide analysis.

Enhanced MIHD visualization pipelines with dynamic metric overlays and executed large-scale benchmarking across multiple DLPFC spatial transcriptomics slides.

Tasks

Architecture & Strategy

• ✅ Add Metrics Overlay to MIHD Spatial Visualizations — Refactored utils/visualization.py and evaluate_rm_ideal.py to manually construct matplotlib figures, allowing the superposition of real-time ARI, NMI, Silhouette, and Spearman P-values directly onto output PNGs.
• ✅ Execute Full DLPFC Benchmarking and RM-Ideal Evaluation — Ran comprehensive benchmark pipelines (PCA/UNI/GCN + STAIG Fusion) across all available slides, identified data path failures in specific sections (151510, 151672, etc.), and launched parallel RM-Ideal niche capture evaluations for the successfully processed segments.

Problems & Solutions

Critical Issues

1. Benchmark script threw ‘staig_fusion fusion requires spatial coordinates’ on section 151510 and OpenCV cvtColor errors on 151672/151674.

Solution: Reviewed the code logic to diagnose missing spatial CSVs or corrupted image headers in the shared data directory. Configured subsequent runs to bypass these specific failed sections without aborting the entire pipeline.

Key Insight: Data integrity in multi-center spatial datasets is inconsistent; robust pipelines must implement per-slide data availability checks before launching heavy computational tasks like STAIG alignment.

General Issues

2. Initial attempts to run all benchmark variants simultaneously caused GPU OOM failures, killing the background PCA process.

Solution: Interrupted parallel tasks and re-executed benchmarks sequentially to manage system resources safely without crashes.

Key Insight: Complex multi-modal embedding extractions (STAIG fusion + UNI2) heavily saturate VRAM; sequential execution is necessary for stability on HPC environments with multiple active models.

3. Duplicate function definitions (create_clustering_visualization) shadowing imports in run_benchmark.py prevented updated metrics from appearing initially.

Solution: Identified and refactored both the local inline definition and the primary utility file to ensure metric injection was applied consistently during execution.

Key Insight: Inlining functions within large benchmark scripts is a common pitfall that bypasses modular code paths; always verify call-site resolution before running full tests.

Human vs AI Approaches

Strategic Level

Designing Dynamic Text Overlays for Scanpy/Plots

Role	Approach
Human	Identified the need to bypass automated saving (which locks the figure) in order to append quantitative data text boxes post-generation.
AI	AI resolved this by switching scanpy’s sc.pl.spatial(..., save=) mode to an explicit fig, ax = plt.subplots() layout pattern with manual bounding boxes for rendering metrics cleanly.

Difference Analysis: The human focused on the analytical requirement (seeing scores directly on the image), while the AI provided the specific library-level workaround to break scanpy’s encapsulation safely.

Implementation Level

Prioritizing Historical vs. Current Benchmark Results

Role	Approach
Human	User noted that current outputs didn’t match the best historical scores and strictly instructed not to overwrite existing pca_uni_staig_fusion results or use overrides.
AI	AI switched from attempting fresh parallel generation to a targeted incremental run on missing cached sections, aligning exactly with historical configurations to preserve data integrity.

Difference Analysis: The human provided strong constraints against overwriting legacy data, preventing a common AI mistake of blindly prioritizing newest code paths over established validation baselines.

AI Limitations

General Limitations

• The initial parallel launching of three heavy benchmark scripts without checking available HPC node VRAM limits resulted in OOM signal (137) kills, demonstrating imperfect environmental state awareness before execution.
• AI struggled initially to identify which local file (scripts/run_benchmark.py vs utils/visualization.py) was actively handling the function call, leading to a minor delay before both were successfully patched.

Learnings

Key Learnings

• When dealing with spatial transcriptomics embedding benchmarks on multi-center datasets like DLPFC, data inconsistencies (like missing .txt coordinates or corrupted H&E images) are highly probabilistic; automated pipelines must include per-section validity gates to allow the pipeline to finish gracefully for healthy slides.

Conversation Summaries

✅ Enhancing Benchmark Visualization with Metrics Overlay 21:46:17.845 | claude_code User requested augmenting standard MIHD clustering plots and RM-Ideal evaluations by displaying quantitative performance metrics (ARI, NMI, Silhouette) directly on the visualization images. I successfully refactored utils/visualization.py, breaking away from scanpy’s default file-saver method to manually construct matplotlib subplots with annotated bounding boxes. I also modified run_benchmark.py and evaluate_rm_ideal.py payloads to ensure metrics are fed into these new plotting functions.

✅ Running Comprehensive Slide Benchmarks and RM-Ideal Evaluations 21:50:31.276 | claude_code Following the visualization refactor, I was instructed to run extensive benchmarks across all 11+ DLPFC slides using various embeddings (PCA, UNI2, GCN) fused with STAIG alignment. Initial attempts at parallel execution failed due to GPU OOM issues. I pivoted to running historically strong configurations sequentially and correctly skipped sections with corrupted or missing spatial coordinates (151510, 151672-4). Additionally, I launched background processes to evaluate RM-Ideal niche scoring capabilities to measure exact tissue structure capture across these embeddings.

Token Usage